For the past two years, special prosecutor Robert Mueller has been sitting on a political powder keg; in an eight-and-a-half minute statement on Wednesday, he decided to light the fuse.
Robert Mueller is making the political suggestion that President Trump should be impeached on allegations of obstruction of justice for which Mueller and his team of hot-shot lawyers found no proof.
Before she was upended Friday morning by questions about her false claims to minority status, Democratic presidential hopeful Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts was enjoying another positive week in her presidential campaign.
If you read the recent headlines, anyone who climbs Everest barely makes it up, leaves trash and is a rich, selfish narcissist who comes home to brag about how easy it was and how they did it better than anyone else.
Joe Biden leads second-place Bernie Sanders by 18 points in the Democratic primary race, in part because he commands such a large share of the black vote.
As a prosecutor who styles himself detached, dispassionate and above reproach, Robert Mueller has become a political bomb thrower. There is no other way to describe his behavior. After Wednesday’s press conference, the Senate Judiciary Committee should call him to testify and ask hard questions.
President Trump and his defenders can successfully attack former Special Counsel Robert Mueller or congressional Democrats on impeachment – but not both. The independent voters who will decide the 2020 election don’t have time for multiple sets of arguments.
Some believe that President Trump’s economic reforms are only benefiting the country’s “one percent.” But in reality, the pro-growth policy agenda being pursued by the current administration is helping the Americans who need it most.
President Trump sent a message of strength and leadership Thursday night when he announced he will impose escalating tariffs on Mexico in a bold move to halt the flow of illegal immigrants and protect our national security.
Robert Mueller’s surprise appearance Wednesday did little to alter the substance of the debate over election interference but it did roil a simmering political cauldron.